The missing middle.
Static aggregators add no synthesis. General chatbots hallucinate and can't be reproduced. Reading ten sources by hand doesn't scale. InkBytes is the synthesis you can trust — because you can check it.
| Synthesizes one page | Citation-traceable | Multi-source by design | Ad-free | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| InkBytes | Yes | Yes | ≥ 2 sources | Yes |
| Google / Apple News | Links only | No | No | Ad-funded |
| Feedly / Inoreader | No | No | No | Yes |
| Ground News | Bias labels | Yes | Yes | Tiered |
| ChatGPT / Perplexity | Yes | Inconsistent | Varies | Yes |
Each does one thing — and stops there.
Google / Apple News
Opaque algorithmic curation. They hand you links, not synthesis, keep you fragmented across tabs, and are funded by ads.
Feedly / Inoreader
RSS aggregation, nothing more. They collect feeds but do no cross-source analysis — the reconciling is still on you.
Ground News
Strong on bias labelling, but it doesn't synthesize a single account — you still read several to understand the event.
ChatGPT / Perplexity
Can summarize, but hallucinates, cites inconsistently, and isn't reproducible — ask twice, get two different answers.
Reading ten sources yourself
The gold standard — and impossible at scale. Nobody opens twenty tabs per event, every day.
InkBytes
A reproducible, traceable pipeline with programmatic QA and a hard ≥2-source rule — not a thin wrapper over an LLM.
Synthesis you can trust because you can check it.
Every claim links to its source. Every page shows its factuality. That's the edge.
Start reading — $9/mo